Claim 1


Action against chemical consultants for erroneous lab results relied upon by a client to provide an environmental assessment for a piece of property. The property was purchased based on faulty environmental assessment and was later discovered to require environmental remediation.

Claim 2

Insured is retained to give advice on fire and explosion risks at a factory. After fires occurred at the factory, the plaintiff alleged that it had implemented the Insured’s recommendations. The plaintiff asserted damages arising from the fire.

  • The plaintiff asserted actions against the Insured:
    • Negligence
    • Breach of contract

Claim 3

Claimant, a chemical processing plant, contended that the chemical process designed and developed by the Insured caused the claimant’s machines to not function at capacity.